In the National League, the elongated double switch shows again why pitching statistics are quite poorly attributed. A traditional double switch involves the manager inserting a position player into the game for the current pitcher and a new pitcher for a position player--typically one who just made an out, so that the new pitcher won't be batting for nearly a full trip through the lineup.
Mlb
20 August 2009
10 July 2009
Here'e another quirky entry into the "Win" category: http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=4318608. If we used Team pitching statistics, that win would simply go to the Nationals pitching staff, which clearly it should have.
Posted by Eric Hatleback | No comments yet
9 July 2009
As the Brewers wrap up a series against the Cardinals and Tony LaRussa's peculiar lineup strategy, I thought it might be worth thinking about what would make certain lineups advantageous. LaRussa has been hitting the pitcher in the 8th spot, with a position player hitting behind him in the 9th slot, for several years now. Why?
Posted by Eric Hatleback | No comments yet
6 July 2009
I got into a discussion with Sean yesterday about the post I made a couple of weeks ago concerning when a runner has officially taken possession of a base. We consulted the rule book (online at baseball-almanac.com, a great site) and found no specific details about the situation. (Though, admittedly, I did not carefully pore over every bit of it research-style, since we were simply having an entertaining discussion.) While shifting through various alternative scenarios to try to tease out the answer, this fun one came up:
Posted by Eric Hatleback | No comments yet
3 July 2009
This game typifies why the open base need not always be filled. Particularly with the winning run on third base, you are asking quite a lot of your pitcher to confine him to the box created by bases loaded. The Brewers should have gone after Soto--a player coming in cold off the bench--with runners on second and third and 2 outs. Instead, they blatantly pitched around him for 3 pitches, then intentionally put him on with the fourth pitch to set the stage for the walk-off walk.
Posted by Eric Hatleback | No comments yet
2 July 2009
Posted by Eric Hatleback | No comments yet
23 June 2009
When you play fantasy football, you play (almost exclusively) in a head-to-head, points-based system. When you play fantasy baseball, you play (almost exclusively) in either a rotisserie or head-to-head, categories-based system. When you play fantasy hockey, you play (almost exclusively) in some form of salary cap, everyone-can-have-player-X-on-the-team sysatem.
Continue reading "Why is there "standardization" fantasy sports?"
Posted by Eric Hatleback | No comments yet
20 June 2009
I thought it would be fitting for my first post to discuss a rules question I've thought about for baseball for quite a long time. Here's the situation: Runner on first, less than 2 outs. The pitcher accidentally goes into the windup, and the runner takes off for second. (Or the runner takes off, then the pitcher goes into the windup.) There is a strange combination of blazing speed in the runner and very slow motion in the pitcher's windup. The runner reaches second base before the pitch reaches the plate. The batter hits a lazy fly to the outfield.
Posted by Eric Hatleback | No comments yet
